Dossier

Pooja Khanna

Claimed Co-Founder (Self-Proclaimed)

Photographs

Charges

• Count 5: Conspiracy

What this defendant knew

If Pooja Khanna participated in team decisions during the concealment period, she possessed knowledge of the exploit and the decision not to disclose.

Intent indicators

• Maintained co-founder identity throughout 16-month silence
• Never publicly corrected the narrative or warned users
• Benefited from token holdings during concealment period (if held ZERO tokens)

Public identity traces

• LinkedIn: Pooja Khanna

Prosecution's theory

Pooja Khanna's culpability depends on whether she held decision-making authority during the concealment period. The prosecution's theory: if she was a legitimate co-founder who participated in the decision to maintain silence, she is a co-conspirator. If she was merely a peripheral figure who self-identified as co-founder without actual authority, her culpability is reduced but she remains liable as an accessory to conspiracy for failing to disclose known fraud. Her LinkedIn claims create an estoppel — she cannot now claim ignorance while maintaining the co-founder title.

Incriminating exhibits

• Exhibit D-14: LinkedIn profile

  Self-identification as co-founder during exploit period

Proofs & Evidence Collection

The following evidentiary items are preserved in this repository. Each item is timestamped, verifiable on public block explorers or web archives, and subpoena-ready for law enforcement. File paths reference the local evidence archive; URLs link to live public sources.